کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4302617 1288459 2010 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Peritumoral Lymphatic Microvessel Density Associated with Tumor Progression and Poor Prognosis in Gastric Carcinoma
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Peritumoral Lymphatic Microvessel Density Associated with Tumor Progression and Poor Prognosis in Gastric Carcinoma
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundLymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis are critical processes for tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis, and are crucial for therapeutic strategies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of lymphangiogenesis and its regulation in gastric carcinomas.MethodsThe lymphatic vessel density (LVD) in 65 gastric carcinoma cases was investigated by immunohistochemistry using D2-40 antibody, and evaluated with prognostic parameters. The intratumoral microvessel density (MVD), using CD31 antibody, was assessed and correlated with LVD.ResultsD2-40 identified peritumoral lymphatics in all cases, and lymphatic vessel density (LVD) ranged from 3 to 19 (median, 5; mean ± SD, 7.69 ± 4.67). The peritumoral LVD significantly correlated with large tumor size (P = 0.0001), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004), visceral organ metastasis (P = 0.0001), and TNM stage (P = 0.001). Survival was also significantly lower in patients with high LVD tumors than in patients with low LVD tumors (P = 0.04). Among various clinicopathologic characteristics, CD31 expression was associated only with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between CD31 and D2-40.ConclusionOur study showed that lymphangiogenesis plays an important role in the progression of gastric carcinoma. Therefore, D2-40, as an indicator for tumor lymphangiogenesis, may serve as a prognostic marker in gastric carcinoma.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Surgical Research - Volume 164, Issue 1, November 2010, Pages 110–115
نویسندگان
, , , ,