Is breast conservation therapy a viable option for patients with triple-receptor negative breast cancer?

BackgroundTriple-receptor negative breast cancers (TNBC) are aggressive neoplasms that lack estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor, and HER-2 expressions. Comparative analysis of breast conservation therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy for TNBC is reported sparsely. We hypothesized that, despite its aggressive behavior, TNBC can be managed with BCT.MethodsOutcomes for 202 patients with TNBC who were treated with BCT or mastectomy were analyzed. Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analysis performed included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank, independent samples t test, Cox proportional hazard model, and Chi-square.ResultsBCT was performed in 30% of patients. Isolated local recurrence rate for BCT and mastectomy was 0% and 10.6%, respectively (P = .02). Isolated regional recurrence rate for BCT and mastectomy was 1.6% and 1.4%, respectively (P = .61). Neither concomitant locoregional and distant recurrence rate (P = .73) nor isolated distant recurrence rate (P = .71) was significantly different between the BCT and mastectomy groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was better for the BCT group than the mastectomy group (89% vs 69%; P = .018); however, this was likely due to the mastectomy group having a larger neoplasm size (T3/T4: 4% BCT vs 27% mastectomy; P = .0002), advanced N-disease (N2/3: 8% BCT vs 25% mastectomy; P = .0003), and advanced stage of disease (stage 3: 8% BCT vs 35% mastectomy; P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, surgical approach had no effect on either disease-free survival (P = .60) or OS (P = .19); only t-stage was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (P = .02), while N-stage was an independent predictor for OS (P = .03).ConclusionDespite TNBC's aggressive behavior, breast conservation therapy is a viable option for selected patients with TNBC.