Infrapopliteal arterial reconstructions for limb salvage in patients aged ≥80 years according to preoperative ambulatory function and residential status

BackgroundAlthough numerous studies have addressed peripheral revascularizations for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in patients aged ≥80 years, few have focused exclusively on infrapopliteal arterial reconstructions. This study aimed to analyze early and long-term outcomes in very elderly patients who underwent surgical infrapopliteal revascularization for CLI according to their pre-operative ambulatory function and residential status.MethodsOver an 18-year period, all consecutive patients aged ≥80 years referred to our institution for CLI requiring primary infrapopliteal or inframalleolar arterial reconstruction were enrolled in the study. All procedures were completed by the same surgeon with patients under regional anesthesia. Patency, limb salvage, amputation-free survival, and cumulative survival rates were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The patient's pre- and postoperative ambulatory function and residential status (at home vs in a nursing home) were also analyzed. The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0.1–11.5) and was obtained for 98% of patients.ResultsIn all, 197 patients (134 men; mean ± SD age, 82.8 ± 1.7 years) with 201 critically ischemic limbs were enrolled in the study. No deaths or fatal major complications occurred in the peri-operative period (first 30 days); the local complication rate was 6%. After 1 and 7 years, the primary patency rates were 88% and 68%, the limb salvage rates were 96% and 87%, the amputation-free survival rates were 88% and 39%, and the survival rates were 91% and 44%, respectively. At last follow-up or death, 80% of the patients were ambulatory and 20% were not; 80% lived at home and were independent, another 9% lived at home with assistance, and 76% of the sample lived at home and were ambulatory.ConclusionInfrapopliteal arterial revascularization in the very elderly with CLI proved safe, effective, and durable, confirming that age per se and concomitant comorbidities do not necessarily affect technical and clinical outcomes. Ambulatory function and independent living status are well preserved because, despite a relatively short life expectancy, the majority of very elderly revascularized CLI patients can be expected to spend their remaining years ambulatory and at home. In contrast, patients with poor ambulatory function or who required assistance pre-operatively were less likely to improve their status after limb revascularization despite a successful technical result.