کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4309464 | 1289312 | 2008 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: For whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: For whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact?](/preview/png/4309464.png)
BackgroundHistorically, the negative appendectomy rate (NAR) for patients operated on for acute appendicitis (AA) has exceeded 20%. We sought to define the current NAR with increased use of computed tomography (CT) and laparoscopy.MethodsRecords of 1425 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy for suspicion of AA during the past 7 years at a single institution were reviewed. The NAR was calculated and compared with earlier data from this institution (1995–1999). Statistical methods included the Fisher exact test and the Student t test; differences of P < .05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsThe overall NAR was 7.65% compared to 16.3% over the period 1995–1999 (P = .0001), without a change in the perforation rate. Concurrently, the rate of preoperative CT increased from 32% to 95%. CT was associated with a lesser NAR only among adult females (7.6% vs 20.8%, P = .005) but not among adult males or children. No difference in NAR was noted in comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Patients without AA had a greater mean duration of symptoms and lower white blood cell count at presentation than those with AA. Most patients undergoing negative appendectomy had a CT, and more than 50% had CT interpretations that were positive for, or could not exclude, AA.ConclusionsThe NAR in our hospital has decreased progressively to ∼5%. Although preoperative CT is used in almost all patients, it is only associated with a lesser NAR among adult females. False-positive CTs may contribute to the residual NAR, and further data are needed to determine whether subgroups of male or pediatric patients benefit from preoperative CT.
Journal: Surgery - Volume 144, Issue 2, August 2008, Pages 276–282