کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4363958 | 1301589 | 2006 | 38 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: Analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک
دانش تغذیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: Analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: Analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts](/preview/png/4363958.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
The repeatability uncertainty is only indirectly affected by the method in use but depends essentially on the number of counted colonies. On the other hand, the between-laboratory uncertainty varies with the enumeration method in use, this variability is relatively small for the enumerations calling for methods without colony confirmation, i.e. for the enumeration of aerobic micro-organisms, Enterobacteriaceae, 'total' and thermotolerant coliforms, β-glucuronidase-positive E. coli and coagulase-positive staphylococci with the technique using the rabbit-plasma fibrinogen agar. For these methods, the average between-laboratory standard deviation is 0.17 log10 cfu gâ1. The between-laboratory uncertainty is, on the contrary, larger for more complex techniques. For the enumeration of coagulase-positive staphylococci with the Baird-Parker agar, the between-laboratory standard deviation is equal to 0.23 log10 cfu gâ1, it is equal to 0.28 log10 cfu gâ1 for the enumeration of L. monocytogenes, to 0.34 log10 cfu gâ1 for the enumeration of C. perfringens, and to 0.47 log10 cfu gâ1 for the enumeration of anaerobic sulfito-reducing bacteria.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Food Microbiology - Volume 23, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages 1-38
Journal: Food Microbiology - Volume 23, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages 1-38
نویسندگان
Jean-Christophe Augustin, Vincent Carlier,