کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4382267 | 1617807 | 2014 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• Chitin, marigold and anearobic soil disinfestation were better than chemical control.
• Grass–clover, biofumigation, Cultivit and compost were not effective alternatives yet.
• All treatments caused yield increases as a consequence of changes in the soil biota.
• No negative side effects on soil suppressiveness or non-target soil organisms.
• These treatments could be implemented in arable crop rotations worldwide.
There is an urgent need to test and develop sustainable methods for management of soil pathogens, such as the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans and the soil fungus Verticillium dahliae. Ultimately this should be investigated with a multidisciplinary approach, with long-term measurements of biological and chemical parameters and their final impact on crop yield under field conditions. The present study focusses on eight soil health treatments (compost, chitin, marigold, grass–clover, biofumigation, anearobic soil disinfestation, a physical control method and a combination of marigold, compost and chitin) and two control treatments (a chemical control with 300 L/ha Metam sodium and un untreated control). These 10 treatments were studied for their effects on soil chemical quality, soil pathogens and their impact on the yield of potato, lily and carrots during 6 years. The present study did demonstrate that in comparison to chemical control, additions of chitin, anaerobic soil disinfestation and marigold are already excellent alternatives for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes and V. dahliae. We also demonstrated that grass–clover, biofumigation, Cultivit and compost are not effective alternatives for chemical control yet and further development is needed. All treatments caused a yield increase in comparison with the control. The biggest increases of more than 60% were found for the treatments with chitin. Furthermore it was demonstrated that these yield increases were probably less influenced by changes in chemical soil properties, but the consequence of changes in the soil biota, in this case especially the effective control of P. penetrans and V. dahliae. Furthermore it has been demonstrated that most of these soil health treatments could already be implemented in an arable crop rotation and probably adapted for many areas of the world where other alternatives, such as solarisation or soil flooding, are not feasible or too risky.
Journal: Applied Soil Ecology - Volume 76, April 2014, Pages 112–123