کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4438233 1620398 2013 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Distribution, sources and health risk assessment of mercury in kindergarten dust
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات علم هواشناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Distribution, sources and health risk assessment of mercury in kindergarten dust
چکیده انگلیسی


• The concentrations, sources and health risk of Hg in kindergarten dust were investigated.
• The emissions from coal-power plants were the main source of THg in the dust.
• Landfills play an important role in MeHg accumulation in the dust.
• Hg in the dust from educational area posed a high non-cancer risk on the children health.

Mercury (Hg) contamination in urban area is a hot issue in environmental research. In this study, the distribution, sources and health risk of Hg in dust from 69 kindergartens in Wuhan, China, were investigated. In comparison with most other cities, the concentrations of total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) were significantly elevated, ranging from 0.15 to 10.59 mg kg−1 and from 0.64 to 3.88 μg kg−1, respectively. Among the five different urban areas, the educational area had the highest concentrations of THg and MeHg. The GIS mapping was used to identify the hot-spot areas and assess the potential pollution sources of Hg. The emissions of coal-power plants and coking plants were the main sources of THg in the dust, whereas the contributions of municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills and iron and steel smelting related industries were not significant. However, the emission of MSW landfills was considered to be an important source of MeHg in the studied area. The result of health risk assessment indicated that there was a high adverse health effect of the kindergarten dust in terms of Hg contamination on the children living in the educational area (Hazard index (HI) = 6.89).

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Atmospheric Environment - Volume 73, July 2013, Pages 169–176
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,