کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4439057 | 1620422 | 2012 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Critical review of receptor modelling for particulate matter: A case study of India Critical review of receptor modelling for particulate matter: A case study of India](/preview/png/4439057.png)
India is used as a case study in reviewing the application of receptor models for source apportionment. India has high concentrations of airborne particulate matter, and the application of effective abatement measures is a high priority, and demands confidence in the results of source apportionment studies. The many studies conducted are reviewed, and reveal a very wide range of conclusions, even for the same city. To some degree these divergences may be the result of using different sampling locations and/or seasons, but to a large extent differences probably arise from methodological weaknesses. The assignment of factors from multivariate receptor models to specific source categories is in many cases highly questionable as factors often include combinations of chemical constituents that are of low plausibility. This ambiguity in terms of presence of tracer elements may be the result of genuine collinearity of diverse sources, or more probably arises from methodological problems. Few studies have used either organic molecular markers or chemical mass balance (CMB) models, and there is a shortage of data on locally-derived emission source profiles, although recent work has begun to remedy this weakness. The conclusions include a number of recommendations for use in design of future studies.
► Many studies in India have used multivariate statistical models and a few CMB.
► The results are diverse and not explained entirely by different sampling locations.
► Methodological issues are identified.
► Genuine overlaps in chemical composition between soil and road dust create problems.
► Recommendations are given for future studies.
Journal: Atmospheric Environment - Volume 49, March 2012, Pages 1–12