کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
443928 | 692816 | 2014 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We develop a new Riemannian metric that resolves high-curvature tracts deviation.
• The adaptive metric is computed by solving a variational problem on the manifold.
• Our method computes geodesics that more faithfully follow the principal eigenvectors.
• We present an automatic segmentation method that does not require user intervention.
• Our method improves segmentations of white matter tracts, including crossing tracts.
We present a novel geodesic approach to segmentation of white matter tracts from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Compared to deterministic and stochastic tractography, geodesic approaches treat the geometry of the brain white matter as a manifold, often using the inverse tensor field as a Riemannian metric. The white matter pathways are then inferred from the resulting geodesics, which have the desirable property that they tend to follow the main eigenvectors of the tensors, yet still have the flexibility to deviate from these directions when it results in lower costs. While this makes such methods more robust to noise, the choice of Riemannian metric in these methods is ad hoc. A serious drawback of current geodesic methods is that geodesics tend to deviate from the major eigenvectors in high-curvature areas in order to achieve the shortest path. In this paper we propose a method for learning an adaptive Riemannian metric from the DTI data, where the resulting geodesics more closely follow the principal eigenvector of the diffusion tensors even in high-curvature regions. We also develop a way to automatically segment the white matter tracts based on the computed geodesics. We show the robustness of our method on simulated data with different noise levels. We also compare our method with tractography methods and geodesic approaches using other Riemannian metrics and demonstrate that the proposed method results in improved geodesics and segmentations using both synthetic and real DTI data.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (371 K)Download as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Medical Image Analysis - Volume 18, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 161–175