Theoretical evaluation of errors in aerosol optical depth retrievals from ground-based direct-sun measurements due to circumsolar and related effects

Aerosol optical depth (AOD) has a crucial importance for estimating the optical properties of the atmosphere, and is constantly present in optical models of aerosol systems. Any error in aerosol optical depth (∂AOD) has direct and indirect consequences. On the one hand, such errors affect the accuracy of radiative transfer models (thus implying, e.g., potential errors in the evaluation of radiative forcing by aerosols). Additionally, any error in determining AOD is reflected in the retrieved microphysical properties of aerosol particles, which might therefore be inaccurate.Three distinct effects (circumsolar radiation, optical mass, and solar disk’s brightness distribution) affecting ∂AOD are qualified and quantified in the present study. The contribution of circumsolar (CS) radiation to the measured flux density of direct solar radiation has received more attention than the two other effects in the literature. It varies rapidly with meteorological conditions and size distribution of the aerosol particles, but also with instrument field of view. Numerical simulations of the three effects just mentioned were conducted, assuming otherwise “perfect” experimental conditions. The results show that CS is responsible for the largest error in AOD, while the effect of brightness distribution (BD) has only a negligible impact. The optical mass (OM) effect yields negligible errors in AOD generally, but noticeable errors for low sun (within 10° of the horizon). In general, the OM and BD effects result in negative errors in AOD (i.e. the true AOD is smaller than that of the experimental determination), conversely to CS. Although the rapid increase in optical mass at large zenith angles can change the sign of ∂AOD, the CS contribution frequently plays the leading role in ∂AOD. To maximize the accuracy in AOD retrievals, the CS effect should not be ignored. In practice, however, this effect can be difficult to evaluate correctly unless the instantaneous aerosols size distribution is known from, e.g., inversion techniques.