کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4463467 1621680 2013 19 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Effect of heterogeneous atmospheric CO2 on simulated global carbon budget
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات فرآیندهای سطح زمین
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Effect of heterogeneous atmospheric CO2 on simulated global carbon budget
چکیده انگلیسی

The effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) on terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration have been a key focus in global change studies. As anthropological CO2 emissions substantially increase, the spatial variability of atmospheric CO2 should be considered to reduce the potential bias on C source and sink estimations. In this study, the global spatial–temporal patterns of near surface CO2 concentrations for the period 2003–2009 were established using the SCIAMACHY satellite observations and the GLOBALVIEW-CO2 field observations. With this CO2 data and the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS), our estimation of the global mean annual NPP and NEP was 0.5% and 7% respectively which differs from the traditional C sequestration assessments. The Amazon, Southeast Asia, and Tropical Africa showed higher C sequestration than the traditional assessment, and the rest of the areas around the world showed slightly lower C sequestration than the traditional assessment. We find that the variability of NEP is less intense under heterogeneous CO2 pattern on a global scale. Further studies of the cause of CO2 variation and the interactions between natural and anthropogenic processes of C sequestration are needed.


► We established the spatial–temporal patterns of near surface CO2 (2003–2009).
► We carried out simulation experiments based on a land process model IBIS.
► Global estimations of NPP and NEP were lower under uneven CO2 patterns.
► Tropical regions showed higher C sequestration than traditional assessment.
► The heterogeneity of atmospheric CO2 is important to carbon budget.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Global and Planetary Change - Volume 101, February 2013, Pages 33–51
نویسندگان
, , , , ,