کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4511671 | 1624749 | 2007 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to pre-anthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to pre-anthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale](/preview/png/4511671.png)
In temperate cereals are commonly accepted that determination of grain number (GN) and grain weight (GW) scarcely overlap during the crop cycle. However, the assumption that GW is determined exclusively after anthesis needs to be critically reviewed in the light of reports published over the few years where temperature treatments imposed before anthesis decreased GW of bread wheat. Although these evidences suggest that both GW and GN could be affected by environmental conditions before anthesis little is known about the effect of pre-anthesis temperature on these two main yield components in wheat, barley and triticale at field conditions. In addition, the effect of temperature on GW and GN at different stages prior to anthesis has been scarcely evaluated. The objectives of the current study were: (i) to evaluate the overall response, and specific differences, of GN and GW to pre-anthesis temperature, and (ii) to study the effect of different timings of high temperature at pre-anthesis on GN and GW in wheat, barley and triticale. Three fully irrigated field experiments were carried out in three successive seasons. At each season, a wheat, barley and triticale high yielding cultivar was evaluated at three temperature regimes: control, and two timings of heating before anthesis. During the first and second seasons, the timings of heating were booting-anthesis and heading-anthesis. In the thirst season, the timings were beginning of stem elongation-booting and booting-anthesis. Plots were arranged in a split-plot design with three replicates, where the main plot was assigned to thermal regime and the sub-plots to crop species. To apply heat, transparent chambers equipped with thermostatically controlled electric heaters were used. The thermal regime was controlled by sensors connected to a temperature regulator and recorded using data loggers. Temperature within the chambers was stable across developmental stages, crops, and seasons; it averaged 5.5 °C higher than air temperature. Thermal treatments consistently reduced grain yield (p < 0.05), the magnitude of the effect ranged between 5 and 52%. The highest effect was found when temperature increased during stem elongation (yield decrease: 46%), lowest when treatments were imposed during heading-anthesis (15%) and intermediate for treatments imposed during booting-anthesis (27%). Most effects of thermal treatments on yield were due to parallel effects on GN. However, thermal treatments significantly (p < 0.05) decreased GW during the three seasons. The most effecting treatment on GW was when the crops were heated during the B-A period, i.e. GW decreased up to 23%.
Journal: Field Crops Research - Volume 100, Issues 2–3, 1 February 2007, Pages 240–248