Theoretical analysis and field evidence of reciprocity gaps during interference pumping tests

We address the question of the reciprocity of drawdowns observed during a sequence of interference pumping tests performed within a porous medium, in the context of different conceptual models of subsurface flow. We provide a generalization of the work by Bruggeman (1972) [5], extending his results obtained in 1972 for Darcian flows in an unbounded, heterogeneous porous medium. We then analyze reciprocity within a dual-continuum conceptualization, where the medium is viewed as being composed of two overlapping continua, representing the porous matrix and embedded fractures, respectively. We show theoretically, and demonstrate numerically, that only drawdowns associated with the fracture continuum display reciprocity under transient flow conditions. Conversely, non-flowing matrix and fracture continua display reciprocity behavior under steady-state conditions. We then provide field evidence of the insurgence of reciprocity gaps by analyzing interference test data from the karstic limestone aquifer of the Hydrogeological Experimental Site (HES) in Poitiers, France. On the basis of our theoretical results and experimental observations, we discuss different interpretations of the observed reciprocity gaps. These include (a) non-linear dependencies of local hydraulic parameters, (b) occurrence of internal boundaries within the domain, (c) inertial effects that develop through open conduits within the rock matrix, (d) modifications of the aquifer properties between subsequent pumping tests, and (e) significant contribution of the matrix pressure in monitored wells when the behavior of the aquifer is conceptualized by a dual-continuum approach.

Research highlights
► Reciprocity holds for Darcian flow regardless of initial and boundary conditions.
► Matrix responses in dual continua systems generally display reciprocity gaps.
► Karstic aquifers may merge reciprocal and non-reciprocal responses to pumping tests.
► Inertial flow and matrix responses are the main reasons for reciprocity gaps in karsts.
► Merging reciprocal and non-reciprocal responses in an inverse problem is questionable.