Column study of Cr(VI) removal by cationic hydrogel for in-situ remediation of contaminated groundwater and soil

Column experiments were conducted for examining the effectiveness of the cationic hydrogel on Cr(VI) removal from groundwater and soil. For in-situ groundwater remediation, the effects of background anions, humic acid (HA) and pH were studied. Cr(VI) has a higher preference for being adsorbed onto the cationic hydrogel than sulphate, bicarbonate ions and HA. However, the adsorbed HA reduced the Cr(VI) removal capacity of the cationic hydrogel, especially after regeneration of the adsorbents, probably due to the blockage of adsorption sites. The Cr(VI) removal was slightly influenced by the groundwater pH that could be attributed to Cr(VI) speciation. The 6-cycle regeneration and reusability study shows that the effectiveness of the cationic hydrogel remained almost unchanged. On average, 93% of the adsorbed Cr(VI) was recovered in each cycle and concentrated Cr(VI) solution was obtained after regeneration. For in-situ soil remediation, the flushing water pH had an insignificant effect on the release of Cr(VI) from the soils. Multiple-pulse flushing increased the removal of Cr(VI) from the soils. In contrast, more flushing water and longer operation may be required to achieve the same removal level by continuous flushing.

Research Highlights
► Cationic hydrogel had the highest selectivity for Cr(VI) adsorption.
► Sulphate posed the greatest influence on Cr(VI) removal by the cationic hydrogel.
► Humic acid could not be thoroughly desorbed and thus reduced Cr(VI) adsorption.
► On average 93% of the adsorbed Cr(VI) was recovered in each regeneration cycle.
► Multiple-pulse flushing coupled with cationic hydrogel had a higher Cr(VI) removal.