کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4980310 | 1367826 | 2017 | 30 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Results matter: Three case studies comparing and contrasting PFFM and HazOp PHA reviews
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی شیمی
بهداشت و امنیت شیمی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
HAZOP is widely recognized as the standard for conducting thorough PHA reviews, but it is not the only technique available. In this paper, outcomes of three actual HAZOP reviews in the oil & gas industry are compared and contrasted with the results for the same facilities using Process Flow Failure Modes (PFFM). PFFM is a unique method, best described as a highly efficient, highly effective cross between FMEA and HAZOP, enhanced by a customized visual tool. Differences in the success rate of the two methodologies to identify process hazards are quantified and discussed with the aim of improving the industry success rate in identifying process hazards during PHA reviews in a cost-effective, straightforward manner.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries - Volume 49, Part B, September 2017, Pages 266-279
Journal: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries - Volume 49, Part B, September 2017, Pages 266-279
نویسندگان
R.J. MacGregor,