کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5038505 1472837 2017 16 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
ReviewGeneralized Anxiety Disorder, worry and attention to threat: A systematic review
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اختلال اضطراب نقض عمومی، نگرانی و توجه به تهدید: بررسی منظم
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Twenty-nine published articles were included in the final review.
- Strong evidence of a bias to threat among people with GAD compared to other groups.
- Few studies had investigated this bias in high trait worriers.
- Bias to threat in people with GAD is strongest when threat material were words.

Among anxious populations, attention has been demonstrated to be preferentially biased to threatening material compared to neutral or other valenced material. Individuals who have high levels of trait worry, such as those with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), may be biased to threat but research has produced equivocal findings. This review aimed to systematically review the extant experimental literature to establish the current evidence of attentional bias to threat among trait worriers compared to healthy controls and other clinical populations. Twenty-nine published articles were included in the final review. There was strong evidence of a bias to threat among GAD patients compared to other groups and this was found across most experimental paradigms. Few studies had investigated this bias in non-clinical trait worriers. Among GAD patients this bias to threat was most strongly evidenced when visual threat material was in a verbal-linguistic format (i.e., words) rather than when in pictorial form (i.e., images or faces). The bias was also found across several domains of negative material, supporting the general nature of worry. Further research should look to examine the specific components of the threat bias in GAD, as well as investigating the bias to threat in trait worriers.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Psychology Review - Volume 54, June 2017, Pages 107-122
نویسندگان
, , ,