کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5039129 1473092 2016 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تطابق مقادیر گرادیان سخنرانی کودک از رتبه بندی های جمعیتی
کلمات کلیدی
برون سپاری، رتبه سخنرانی، روش های پژوهش، اختلالات صدا سخنرانی، ادراک گفتاری، مقیاس آنالوگ ویژوال، مخفی مخفی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب شناختی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Ratings aggregated across non-experts listeners can yield gradient speech measures.
- Continuous measures can be derived from either continuous scales or binary ratings.
- Continuous and binary-derived ratings were highly correlated with one another.
- Both measures also correlated highly with an acoustic gold standard.
- Correlations remained significant when examining subsets of n = 9 raters.

Recent research has demonstrated that perceptual ratings aggregated across multiple non-expert listeners can reveal gradient degrees of contrast between sounds that listeners might transcribe identically. Aggregated ratings have been found to correlate strongly with acoustic gold standard measures both when individual raters use a continuous rating scale such as visual analog scaling (Munson et al., 2012) and when individual raters provide binary ratings (McAllister Byun, Halpin, & Szeredi, 2015). In light of evidence that inexperienced listeners use continuous scales less consistently than experienced listeners, this study investigated the relative merits of binary versus continuous rating scales when aggregating responses over large numbers of naive listeners recruited through online crowdsourcing. Stimuli were words produced by children in treatment for misarticulation of North American English /r/. Each listener rated the same 40 tokens two times: once using Visual Analog Scaling (VAS) and once using a binary rating scale. The gradient rhoticity of each item was then estimated using (a) VAS click location, averaged across raters; (b) the proportion of raters who assigned the “correct /r/” label to each item in the binary rating task (pˆ). First, we validate these two measures of rhoticity against each other and against an acoustic gold standard. Second, we explore the range of variability in individual response patterns that underlie these group-level data. Third, we integrate statistical, theoretical, and practical considerations to offer guidelines for determining which measure to use in a given situation.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Communication Disorders - Volume 64, November–December 2016, Pages 91-102
نویسندگان
, , , ,