کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5040543 1473851 2017 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Overprotective social support leads to increased cardiovascular and subjective stress reactivity
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
حمایت اجتماعی بیش از حد محافظ منجر به افزایش واکنش پذیری استرس قلبی عروقی و ذهنی می شود
کلمات کلیدی
حمایت اجتماعی، نظریه خودمختاری، پشتیبانی مستقل، بیش از حفاظت، واکنش پذیری استرس قلب و عروق،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب رفتاری
چکیده انگلیسی


- Overprotective social support may undermine active stress-coping.
- Overprotection did not buffer CVR during support reception.
- Stopping overprotection induced increased cardiovascular and subjective stress.
- Social support stress-buffering research can benefit from Self-Determination theory.
- Autonomy support is recommended when delivering no support is no option.

ObjectiveSelf-determination theory suggests that autonomy-enhancing social support helps individuals to perceive stressors as challenging rather than stressing. Overprotective support may reduce stress in the short-run but undermines autonomy, thus hampering stress-coping in the long run, particularly when social support is terminated.MethodHeartrate, blood-pressure and ratings were examined in N = 44 undergraduate students receiving autonomy support (calculation steps) or overprotection (solutions) from a close friend or no support for solving arithmetic tasks as well as during a subsequent stress-challenge (solving arithmetic tasks alone).ResultsOverprotection resulted in increased heartrate, diastolic blood-pressure, stress ratings, and decreased subjective control during stress-challenge. Autonomy support did not lead to unfavorable stress responding.ConclusionThe current findings are in line with assumptions derived from self-determination theory and indicate that autonomy support can help to prevent stress. Overprotection does not buffer stress and is associated with increased stress when discontinued.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biological Psychology - Volume 123, February 2017, Pages 226-234
نویسندگان
, , ,