کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5050471 1476407 2011 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evaluation of welfare functions of environmental amenities: A case of forest biomass fuels in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک بوم شناسی، تکامل، رفتار و سامانه شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Evaluation of welfare functions of environmental amenities: A case of forest biomass fuels in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
چکیده انگلیسی

This study is an empirical investigation of welfare functions of forest biomass fuels in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. The want parameter of welfare function was found to vary with household's current fuel consumption which reflects people's amenity aspirations shift with the amenity level attained. Furthermore, current wood consumption and welfare sensitivity parameter are also influenced by individual's environmental entitlements rather than economic entitlements. Resource scarcity induced by physical scarcity or institutional-legal constraints leads to resource conserving attitude, but not without loss in perceived well-being. Communal conservation of energy is also observed whereby large households are more energy conserving than small households. Regarding biomass use and consumption, monetary income does not guarantee satisfaction, but heightens people's wants. Thus, rural development programs should not focus on economic empowerment only but also on environmental sustainability and fair resource use rules.

Research highlights► We model household welfare parameters of biomass fuels in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. ► Environmental and institutional-legal entitlements influence welfare strongly. ► Resource scarcity leads to energy conservation, but with loss in well-being. ► Rural development programs should not focus on economic empowerment only. ► Environmental sustainability and fair resource use rules are pre-requisites of rural development.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Ecological Economics - Volume 72, 15 December 2011, Pages 129-139
نویسندگان
, ,