کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5074337 | 1373694 | 2011 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: The Politics of Nature in British Columbia's Great Bear Rainforest The Politics of Nature in British Columbia's Great Bear Rainforest](/preview/png/5074337.png)
Environmental politics, argues French philosopher Bruno Latour, have been a 'disappointment'. Rather than trying to bring environmental concerns into a political world split into two - between Nature/Science and politics/society - Latour argues that environmental movements ought to focus on destroying this two-house collective, and develop 'an understanding of ecological crises that no longer uses nature to account for the tasks to be accomplished'. In this paper I put my research on the politics and science of the Great Bear Rainforest (GBR), a large tract of temperate rainforest on the central and north coast of British Columbia, into direct conversation with Latour's arguments about science, epistemology and environmental politics. The GBR was a site of intense political struggle focused predominantly on the scale and scope of industrial forestry, a struggle which 'ended' in 2006 with what some call a historic compromise between some high-profile environmental groups, First Nations, the Provincial government, and the forest industry. This paper focuses on two interlinked questions: do the environmental organizations at the centre of the struggle demonstrate the maladies identified by Latour; are they too preoccupied with representing Nature through Science? And second, do these maladies help us explain or understand the politics over the GBR? Were the politics of the GBR limited by environmentalist invocations of a singular Nature through Science, what Latour calls 'Naturpolitik'? The encounter between theory and practice leads to a more cautious and critical assessment of the environmental politics in the GBR, but also tempers Latour's arguments. Environmentalists in the GBR do exhibit Latour's maladies, but in tracing the Politics of Nature there, it seems that Naturpolitik is not as powerful as Latour argues.
Research highlights⺠Bruno Latour claims that environmental movements continue to disappoint because they continue to use nature 'to account for the tasks to be accomplished'. ⺠This paper places Latour's claims in close conservation with a political struggle over the temperate rainforests of British Columbia, in a place known as the Great Bear Rainforest. ⺠Tempering Latour's claims, my research in finds that even though environmental activists continue to use 'Nature” through Science to ground their claims, there are many other factors, especially economic, constraining environmental movements.
Journal: Geoforum - Volume 42, Issue 2, March 2011, Pages 211-221