Pyramidal group structure and bank risk in Thailand

- This paper proposes risk sheltering as a further motivation of the pyramidal structure of banks.
- Lower-tier banks tend to extend loans more aggressively and perform poorly, while upper-tier banks carry out more profitable investments.
- The results suggest that the multilayer organizational structure of bank ownership can affect a bank's lending behavior and its resistance to economic shocks.

This paper investigates how banks and finance companies operate in business groups. Using uniquely detailed ownership data from Thailand, we find that the controlling shareholders extensively use pyramids to control banks and finance companies and assign different lending strategies across pyramidal tiers. Lower-tier banks tend to extend loans more aggressively and perform more poorly, while upper tier banks carry out more profitable investments. After the crisis hit, upper-tier banks survived and almost all lower-tier banks went bankrupt. Our results suggest that the multilayer organizational structure of bank ownership can affect a bank's lending behavior and its resistance to economic shocks.