کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5120104 1486119 2017 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A randomized controlled trial to influence client language in substance use disorder treatment
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک کارآزمائی کنترل شده تصادفی برای نفوذ به زبان مشتری در درمان اختلال مصرف مواد
کلمات کلیدی
مصاحبه انگیزشی، آموزش مشاوره، زبان مشتری آزمایش تصادفی کنترل شده، مکانیسم فعال، جزء فنی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب رفتاری
چکیده انگلیسی


- Influencing what clients say about change is a goal of motivational interviewing.
- Specialized training was used to train therapists to influence client language.
- Statements opposing change were lower in clients of specially trained therapists.
- Statements in favor of change did not increase.
- Client language can be influenced during motivational interviewing sessions.

BackgroundClient language is hypothesized to be a mechanism of action in motivational interviewing (MI). Despite the association of change and sustain talk with substance treatment outcomes, it not known whether providers can intentionally influence this language as hypothesized.ObjectiveThis is a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether substance use providers can be trained to influence client language.MethodsTreatment providers specializing in substance use disorders (n = 190) were randomly assigned to standard training in MI (MI-AU) or training emphasizing an influence of client language (MI-LEAF). Treatment sessions with actual clients were evaluated 3, 6 and 12 months after training by masked raters. Frequencies of client change and sustain talk were the outcome variables.ResultsSustain talk, but not change talk, was significantly lower in clients whose providers had received the specialized training (b = −0.175, SE = 0.087, p=0.046, CI[−0.348 to 0.002], d = −0.325). Mediation analyses supported a causal chain between a) training, b) providers' attempts to minimize sustain talk in treatment sessions via directive reflective listening and c) client sustain talk in the treatment session (κ2 = 0.0833, bootstrap SE = 0.0394, 95% CI [0.0148, 0.1691]).ConclusionsWith specialized training, providers can reduce the amount of opposition language their clients offer when considering a change in their substance use. Demonstrating that client language is under partial control of the provider supports the feasibility of clinical trials to investigate the impact of shaping client language on treatment outcomes.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Drug and Alcohol Dependence - Volume 172, 1 March 2017, Pages 43-50
نویسندگان
, , , , ,