کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5122321 1487130 2017 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection)
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی تفکر انتقادی در نوشتار بازتابنده: توسعه و آزمایش ارزیابی کارتر از تفکر انتقادی در مامایی (بازتاب)
کلمات کلیدی
تفکر انتقادی، پیش ثبت نام مامایی، دانش آموزان، بازتاب، روزنامه نگاری،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی زنان، زایمان و بهداشت زنان
چکیده انگلیسی


- Critical thinking and reflection development are essential in midwifery education.
- Limited evidence exists on effective teaching to develop critical thinking.
- Reliable and valid measures of critical thinking are required.
- Midwifery critical thinking can be assessed in written reflections.
- CACTiM is valid and reliable in assessing critical thinking in reflective writing.

Objectivedevelop and test a tool designed for use by academics to evaluate pre-registration midwifery students' critical thinking skills in reflective writing.Designa descriptive cohort design was used.Samplea random sample (n = 100) of archived student reflective writings based on a clinical event or experience during 2014 and 2015.Methodsa staged model for tool development was used to develop a fifteen item scale involving item generation; mapping of draft items to critical thinking concepts and expert review to test content validity; inter-rater reliability testing; pilot testing of the tool on 100 reflective writings; and psychometric testing. Item scores were analysed for mean, range and standard deviation. Internal reliability, content and construct validity were assessed.Findingsexpert review of the tool revealed a high content validity index score of 0.98. Using two independent raters to establish inter-rater reliability, good absolute agreement of 72% was achieved with a Kappa coefficient K = 0.43 (p<0.0001). Construct validity via exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: analyses context, reasoned inquiry, and self-evaluation. The mean total score for the tool was 50.48 (SD = 12.86). Total and subscale scores correlated significantly. The scale achieved good internal reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .93.Conclusionthis study establishedthe reliability and validity of the CACTiM (reflection) for use by academics to evaluate midwifery students' critical thinking in reflective writing. Validation with large diverse samples is warranted.Implications for practicereflective practice is a key learning and teaching strategy in undergraduate Bachelor of Midwifery programmes and essential for safe, competent practice. There is the potential to enhance critical thinking development by assessingreflective writing with the CACTiM (reflection) tool to provide formative and summative feedback to students and inform teaching strategies.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Midwifery - Volume 54, November 2017, Pages 73-80
نویسندگان
, , , , ,