کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5127907 1489065 2016 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Dual frontiers without convexity
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
دو مرز بدون محدب
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه سایر رشته های مهندسی مهندسی صنعتی و تولید
چکیده انگلیسی


- We develop authentic optimistic and pessimistic DEA models without convexity.
- The input- and output oriented FDH models are considered.
- In order to improve the discrimination power, extended super-efficiency FDH models are proposed.
- We bypass the infeasibility problem in the proposed FDH super models.
- Numerical results based on a case study from the literature are provided and compared with other models.

The conventional optimistic data envelopment analysis (DEA) model typically evaluates decision-making units (DMUs) using the best relative efficiency that is derived from the estimated efficient production frontier, while the pessimistic DEA model evaluates the DMUs according to the estimated inefficient production frontier. Although the results of these models vary significantly, both approaches should be incorporated for an overall performance evaluation, and a significant body of literature exists on this topic. This paper contributes to the literature by providing entirely new non-convex optimistic and pessimistic models by applying free disposal hull (FDH) technology, which is important in real-life scenarios. These models may experience a lack of sufficient discrimination power. Accordingly, two improved versions of both approaches are developed. The first version formulates the models in the presence of the slack variables. In the second version, we propose FDH super-efficiency models that may become infeasible. Thus, we propose the modified models without infeasibility problem. The paper concludes with a comprehensive empirical study to illustrate the details and applicability of the proposed models.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Computers & Industrial Engineering - Volume 101, November 2016, Pages 466-478
نویسندگان
, , ,