کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5594594 | 1572073 | 2017 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Off-Hours Versus On-Hours
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Previous studies have reported worse outcomes and longer door-to-balloon times (DBTs) in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after normal working hours, during weekends, and on holidays (off-hours) compared with normal business hours (on-hours). Recent studies, however, have reported similar outcomes regardless of presentation time. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried from January 1990 through December 2016. Only studies comparing STEMI outcomes during off-hours versus on-hours with percutaneous coronary intervention were included. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to pool outcomes across the studies. Clinical end points included short- (<30 days of presentation), intermediate- (at 1 to 2 years), and long-term (at 3 to 4 years) stent thrombosis, mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). A total of 86,776 patients (62 years and 74.5% male) were identified from 39 studies. There was no significant difference between both groups with regard to mean DBT (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] â2.73 to 4.22, pâ=â0.67) or median DBT (pâ=â0.19). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for short-term end points including mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.25, pâ=â0.08), MI (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.74, pâ=â0.18), MACE (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.20, pâ=â0.40), or stent thrombosis (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.82, pâ=â0.31). Similarly, intermediate-term end points were not statistically different for mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.05, pâ=â0.46), MI (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.02, pâ=â0.08), or MACE (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.08, pâ=â0.98). Long-term end points did not differ statistically between groups for mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.09, pâ=â0.46), MI (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.84, pâ=â0.44), or MACE (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.08, pâ=â0.67). In conclusion, patients presenting with STEMI during off-hours and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention had similar short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes compared with patients presenting during on-hours. DBT was not affected by the time of presentation.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The American Journal of Cardiology - Volume 120, Issue 10, 15 November 2017, Pages 1742-1754
Journal: The American Journal of Cardiology - Volume 120, Issue 10, 15 November 2017, Pages 1742-1754
نویسندگان
Tariq H. MD, Jad MD, Ashraf S. MD, Martin MD, Ehtisham MD, Mitul MD, Herbert D. MD, MPH, Deepak L. MD, MPH,