کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5595565 1572083 2017 25 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Radial Versus Femoral Access for the Treatment of Left Main Lesion in the Era of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Radial Versus Femoral Access for the Treatment of Left Main Lesion in the Era of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents
چکیده انگلیسی
Transradial access (TRA) is often avoided in favor of the transfemoral access (TFA) during percutaneous coronary interventions of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULM), due to technical and safety concerns. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of TRA and TFA in the treatment of ULM with second-generation drug-eluting stents. Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on ULM with second-generation drug-eluting stents were retrospectively enrolled in the multicenter Failure in Left Main Study With 2nd Generation Stents (FAILS 2) registry. Patients were stratified according to the arterial access. The choice between TRA and TFA was left to each operator's preferences. Bleedings during index hospitalization were the primary end point. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularization), the single components of major adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up and stent thrombosis. Propensity score matching was executed to account for possible confounding. Overall, 1,247 patients were enrolled (23.2% [289] of female gender, mean age 70.2 ± 10.2 years). Diagnosis at presentation was stable angina in 603 (48.7%) cases, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in 465 (37.3%), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 117 (9.5%). Mean follow-up was 726 ± 654 days. After propensity score with matching, 354 patients were included. The primary end point was significantly reduced in patients treated with TRA (2.0% vs 4.0%, p = 0.042), whereas no differences emerged pertaining the secondary end points, including target lesion revascularization and reinfarction. In conclusion, TRA may reduce in-hospital bleedings in patients undergoing percutaneous treatment of the ULM, without increasing the rate of adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up, and may therefore be safely used in the treatment of the ULM.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The American Journal of Cardiology - Volume 120, Issue 1, 1 July 2017, Pages 33-39
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,