کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5622196 | 1579195 | 2016 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Full Length ArticleEffect of rivaroxaban on prothrombin fragment 1Â +Â 2 compared with warfarin in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke: Insight from its serial measurement Full Length ArticleEffect of rivaroxaban on prothrombin fragment 1Â +Â 2 compared with warfarin in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke: Insight from its serial measurement](/preview/png/5622196.png)
- Rivaroxaban was successfully initiated 5Â days after stroke onset.
- Prothrombin fragment 1Â +Â 2 is a sensitive marker of thrombin generation.
- Warfarin at therapeutic range inhibits normal thrombin generation.
- Rivaroxaban did not inhibit a normal thrombin generation even at its peak level.
IntroductionPatients with intracerebral hemorrhage during rivaroxaban treatment have small hematoma and favorable outcomes compared with those with warfarin. We investigated its possible mechanism, focusing on prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), a marker of thrombin generation.Materials and methodsIn 65 patients with acute cardioembolic stroke (median 77 years), rivaroxaban was initiated at 5 days after the onset. Plasma F1 + 2 level (normal range, 69-229 pmol/L), prothrombin time (PT), and rivaroxaban concentration evaluated by anti-Xa activity were serially measured.ResultsMedian plasma F1 + 2 was 276 (IQR, 195-454) pmol/L before starting rivaroxaban, and significantly decreased to 196 (141-267) and 192 (151-248) on 7 and 28 days after rivaroxaban, respectively (both p < 0.05). Serial measurements of PT and rivaroxaban concentration at trough, 2, 4, and 6 h after taking rivaroxaban showed a positive correlation (R2 = 0.69, p < 0.01). PT at 4 h after rivaroxaban was significantly prolonged compared with trough (16.6 versus 11.5 s, p < 0.0001). F1 + 2 at 4 h was also decreased compared with trough (160 (123-245.5) versus 196 (141-266.5), p = 0.04), but no patients showed F1 + 2 below the normal range at 4 h. In other 34 patients with warfarin treatment (77 years), median PT-INR and F1 + 2 were 2.06 (1.75-2.50) and 75 (48-111) (p < 0.0001 versus 4 h after rivaroxaban). Notably, of those with PT-INR â¥Â 2.0 (18/34), 12 (12/18, 67%) showed F1 + 2 below the normal range.ConclusionsRivaroxaban retains a normal thrombin generation even at its peak level with prolonged PT, whereas warfarin at therapeutic levels inhibits thrombin generation. This may partly explain different outcomes in patients complicated with bleeding events.
Journal: Thrombosis Research - Volume 148, December 2016, Pages 9-14