Modulation of iTBS after-effects via concurrent directional TDCS: A proof of principle study

- M1 excitability can be modulated by concurrent TDCS and iTBS.
- Posterior-anterior TDCS during iTBS induces a qualitative increase in M1 iTBS after-effects.
- Anterior-posterior TDCS during iTBS abolishes the after-effects of iTBS over M1.

BackgroundPolarising currents can modulate membrane potentials in animals, affecting the after-effect of theta burst stimulation (TBS) on synaptic strength.ObjectiveWe examined whether a similar phenomenon could also be observed in human motor cortex (M1) using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) during monophasic intermittent TBS (iTBS).MethodsTDCS was applied during posterior-anterior iTBS using three different conditions: posterior-anterior TDCS (anode 3.5 cm posterior to M1, cathode 3.5 cm anterior to M1), anterior-posterior TDCS (cathode 3.5 cm posterior to M1, anode 3.5 cm anterior to M1), and sham TDCS.ResultsWhen the direction of TDCS (posterior-anterior) matched the direction of the electrical field induced by iTBS, we found a 19% non-significant increase in excitability changes in comparison with iTBS combined with sham TDCS. When the TDCS was reversed (anterior-posterior), the excitatory effect of iTBS was abolished.ConclusionOur findings suggest that excitatory after-effects of iTBS can be modulated by directionally-specific TDCS.