کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5665936 | 1407778 | 2017 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- aMMP-8 level is not suitable to discriminate between healthy and peri-implant diseases.
- Microbiological findings are similar between healthy, mucositis and peri-implantitis.
- IL-1 polymorphism is no predictor for peri-implant diseases.
- Smoking is potentially associated to peri-implantitis in SIT/SPT.
The aim of this study was to evaluate microbiological findings and aMMP-8 level of peri-implant mucositis (M) and peri-implantitis (P) in patients undergoing supportive implant therapy (SIT). Eighty-nine patients with 171 implants were included. The case definitions were as follows: M: PPD â¥4 mm, BOP; P: PPD â¥Â 4 mm, BOP, radiographic bone loss â¥3.5 mm. Samples of peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) were taken from all peri-implant pockets at each implant to detect periodontal pathogens using PCR and aMMP-8 level with ELISA. Only Treponema denticola (Td) and Prevotella intermedia (Pi) showed significantly higher prevalence in P (healthy implants [HI]: Td = 27%, Pi = 17%; M: Td = 26%, Pi = 15%; P: Td and Pi = 50%; P < 0.05). The mean aMMP-8 level at implant sites did not show any significant difference (P = 0.05) among HI (5.2 ± 8.1), M (9.9 ± 19.0), and P (4.9 ± 7.7). Microbiological findings and aMMP-8 levels are not reliable criteria to distinguish between HI, M, and P in patients undergoing SIT.
Journal: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease - Volume 88, Issue 1, May 2017, Pages 47-52