کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5721856 1608103 2017 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Research paperComparing brief interventions for suicidal individuals not engaged in treatment: A randomized clinical trial
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه مداخلات کوتاه مدت برای افراد خودکشی که درگیر درمان نیستند: یک کارآزمایی بالینی تصادفی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Non-treatment engaged suicidal individuals require empirical attention.
- Single-session coping skills and relaxation training interventions are compared.
- Both interventions yield reductions in suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety.

BackgroundNon-treatment-engaged individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts have been largely overlooked in the intervention literature, despite reviews suggesting most individuals who die by suicide were not in treatment immediately prior to their death. Most intervention studies recruit individuals from treatment providers, potentially neglecting those individuals who are not already engaged in services. These individuals clearly represent a group in need of additional empirical attention.MethodsA randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare a single-session dialectical behavior therapy skills-based intervention to a relaxation training control condition. Ninety-three non-treatment-engaged subjects participated in a single in-person assessment, received one of the intervention protocols, and completed follow-up phone interviews for three months including measures of suicidal ideation, emotion dysregulation, and coping skills, as well as other relevant assessments.ResultsBoth conditions reported significantly reduced levels of suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety; however, analyses revealed no significant differences between conditions on the main outcome measures of suicidal ideation, emotion dysregulation, skills use, depression, or anxiety.LimitationsThe two interventions may have been too similar to permit detection of differential effects with this sample size. Specifically, the control condition may have been too active and there may have been stylistic overlap by providers who delivered both interventions.ConclusionsEncouragingly, half of subjects contacted other mental health services during the follow-up period. Although the two interventions under investigation did not yield differential results, the significant changes in important domains across interventions suggest that brief interventions may hold promise for this difficult-to-reach population.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Affective Disorders - Volume 222, November 2017, Pages 153-161
نویسندگان
, , , ,