کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5722019 | 1608104 | 2017 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Circadian regulation may be a potential treatment for bipolar disorder.
- This study evaluates ramelteon as a maintenance therapy in bipolar disorder.
- Ramelteon efficacy in preventing relapse in bipolar subjects was not shown.
- Sublingual ramelteon was well tolerated in subjects with stable bipolar disorder.
BackgroundThe optimal long-term management strategy for bipolar I disorder patients is not yet established. Evidence supports the rationale for circadian rhythm regulation to prevent mood episode relapse in bipolar patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new sublingual formulation of the melatonin receptor agonist ramelteon (ramelteon SL) as adjunctive therapy in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I patients.MethodsIn a double-blinded trial in the United States and Latin America, adult bipolar I disorder patients stable for ⥠8 weeks before baseline and with a mood episode 8 weeks to 9 months before screening, were randomized to once-daily ramelteon SL 0.1 mg (n = 164), 0.4 mg (n = 160), or 0.8 mg (n = 154), or placebo (n = 164), in addition to their existing treatment. The primary endpoint was time from randomization to relapse of symptoms. The prespecified futility criterion in a planned, unblinded, independent interim analysis was the failure of all ramelteon SL doses to achieve a conditional power ⥠30% compared with placebo.ResultsNo significant differences between any dose of ramelteon SL and placebo were observed. The study was terminated after meeting the futility criteria. Ramelteon SL was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that for oral ramelteon.LimitationsA low rate of relapse events precluded detection of any statistically significant difference between groups.ConclusionsThe study failed to demonstrate the efficacy of ramelteon SL as adjunctive maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder. Interim analyses for futility in clinical studies are valuable in preventing unnecessary exposure of subjects to interventions.
Journal: Journal of Affective Disorders - Volume 221, 15 October 2017, Pages 275-282