کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5728978 1411674 2016 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
4th Congress of the Spanish Society of TransplantationOrgan donationMidterm Results of Renal Transplantation From Controlled Cardiac Death Donors Are Similar to Those From Brain Death Donors
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
4th Congress of the Spanish Society of TransplantationOrgan donationMidterm Results of Renal Transplantation From Controlled Cardiac Death Donors Are Similar to Those From Brain Death Donors
چکیده انگلیسی


- KTx with cDCD grafts present more DGF but get the same renal function than DBD.
- KTx with cDCD graft present at least similar midterm outcomes than those of DBD.
- cDCD nationwide strategy is an opportunity to increase KTx and reduce waiting list.

BackgroundThe systematic use of grafts from controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD) started in our country in 2012 and expanded with the strategic support of National Transplant Organization. We present our experience in kidney transplantation with organs from cDCD donors with a mean follow-up of 3 years.MethodsObservational prospective study of all transplants performed in our center in 2012-2013 followed to 2016. The immunosuppression protocols were triple therapy for low-risk recipients from a standard brain death donor (DBD), adding basiliximab or thymoglobulin induction for extended-criteria donor or high-risk recipient, respectively, and thymoglobulin induction plus triple therapy for all cDCD recipients.ResultsA total of 42 donors were included (84 grafts in total, but 1 discarded due to multiple cysts); 25 DBD and 17 cDCD without differences in age or sex. The graft use rate was 98.9% for cDCD; 55 grafts were implanted in our hospital (26 DBD and 29 cDCD), and the remaining 28 grafts were transferred to other centers. There were no differences in primary failure (3.4% cDCD vs 7.4% DBD), but the cDCD organs had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (51.7% vs 25.9%). Despite that, graft and patient survivals, as well as glomerular filtration rate (66.3 vs 59.6 mL/min) were similar in both groups. Only 1 patient died at home with a functioning graft in the cDCD group.ConclusionsDespite a higher rate of delayed graft function with cDCD, the midterm outcomes are at least similar to those with DBD. The cDCD programs should be promoted to increase the chances of a transplant in our patients.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Transplantation Proceedings - Volume 48, Issue 9, November 2016, Pages 2862-2866
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , ,