کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5728995 1411674 2016 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
4th Congress of the Spanish Society of TransplantationKidney transplantationEffect of Cytomegalovirus Infection on Survival of Older Kidney Transplant Patients (D+/R+): Impact of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Therapy
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
4th Congress of the Spanish Society of TransplantationKidney transplantationEffect of Cytomegalovirus Infection on Survival of Older Kidney Transplant Patients (D+/R+): Impact of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Therapy
چکیده انگلیسی


- Older transplant patients suffer immunosenescence.
- CMV infection has a detrimental effect in overall and cardiovascular survival.
- Valganciclovir prophylaxis induces a protective effect against CMV infection.

BackgroundKidney transplant patients with D+/R+ serology can be treated with either prophylaxis or preemptive valganciclovir. The older transplant population suffers severe immunosenescence, especially patients with latent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (R+). They are more likely to develop indirect CMV effects. Likewise, many patients have significant cardiovascular comorbidity, which makes them more sensitive to these indirect effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of CMV viremia and indirect effects on survival, comparing prophylaxis (V) against preemptive (P) valganciclovir in an older kidney transplant population.MethodsWe analyzed the data of 233 recipients from 2002 (age, >55 years; D+/R+) with ≥6 months of follow-up. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 167 (71.7%) in the V group and 66 (28.3%) in the P group.ResultsThe incidence of CMV infection in the P group was 32% versus 6% in V group. Patients with CMV viremia showed worse survival values than patients without viremia (log rank P = .031). Five-year survivals were 74% vs 88%, respectively. Cox regression showed that the adjusted effect of CMV infection on overall survival was a significant risk (hazard ratio [HR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.003-4.29). Patients with CMV viremia showed worse cardiovascular survival than patients without viremia, with 5-year survivals of 79% vs 94%. Cox regression showed that the adjusted effect of CMV infection was a significant risk (HR, 2.62).ConclusionsCMV infection has a detrimental effect on the survival of older patients. Valganciclovir prophylaxis induces a protective effect against CMV infection and could improve survival of older patients with cardiovascular comorbidities.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Transplantation Proceedings - Volume 48, Issue 9, November 2016, Pages 2931-2937
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,