کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5730970 | 1611467 | 2017 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
IntroductionAbdominoperineal Resection (APR) remains an important option for patients with advanced rectal cancer though some may require multivisceral resection (MVR) in addition to APR. We hypothesized that oncological outcomes would be worse with MVR.MethodsA retrospective review from 2006 to 2015 of 161 patients undergoing APR or MVR for rectal cancer, of whom 118 underwent curative APR or APR with MVR. Perioperative, oncologic and survival metrics were evaluated.ResultsThere were 82 patients who underwent APR and 36 who underwent MVR. Surgical approach and incidence of complications were similar (All PÂ >Â 0.05). There was 1 local recurrence in each of the APR and MVR groups at a mean follow-up of 34 and 32 months, respectively. Distant recurrences occurred in 3 APR patients and 4 MVR patients.ConclusionsAPR and APR with MVR can be performed with comparable morbidity and oncologic outcomes.
Journal: The American Journal of Surgery - Volume 214, Issue 3, September 2017, Pages 416-420