Nipple-sparing mastectomy using a hemi-periareolar incision with or without minimal medial-lateral extensions; clinical outcome and patient satisfaction: A single centre prospective observational study

- Using a periareolar incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy resulted in a wound complication rate of 3.2%.
- No cases of implant or nipple-areola complex loss.
- Mean patient satisfaction was 87%.

BackgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is becoming a viable oncoplastic option. There is debate regarding the best approach that balances oncological safety with aesthetics. In this study, we describe an approach involving a hemi-periareolar incision and evaluate its safety and outcomes.MethodsPatients treated at single center between 2012 and 2015 were observed prospectively. After a histologically negative subareolar biopsy, immediate reconstruction with implant and acellular dermal matrix was performed after NSM. Primary end points were wound complications and explantation. Secondary end points included local recurrence, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and esthetic outcome.ResultsSixty-three patients were included with 92 procedures. Twenty-seven percent received chemotherapy and 12.7% received radiotherapy. Mean follow-up was 27.6 months. There were only 2 wound complications, and no recurrences. Mean outcome scores were promising (Breast Q = 88%, subjective esthetic = 9.2, objective esthetic = 9.3, hardening = 2.6).ConclusionsNSM via a hemi-periareolar incision is oncologically safe with a low-complication rate and high patients' satisfaction.