کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5731406 1611477 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Clinical ScienceHand-assisted laparoscopic vs open colectomy: an assessment from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted cohort
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
لاپاروسکوپی علمی بالینی علیرغم کمپلمان باز: ارزیابی از گروه کالج جراحان گروه همگروه برنامه ریزی شده برای بهبود کیفیت جراحی ملی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Outcomes of HALS and open colectomy were compared using procedure-targeted database.
- NSQIP data demonstrated several advantages of HALS compared with open colectomy.
- Elective HALS colectomy maintains advantages of straight laparoscopy over open.
- HALS provides additional benefit over open surgery for complex colorectal diseases.
- Our study supports benefits of HALS as initial approach or bridge to laparoscopy.

BackgroundPerioperative outcomes of patients who underwent hand-assisted colorectal laparoscopic (HALS) vs open colectomy were compared using recently released procedure-targeted database.MethodsReview was conducted using the 2012 colectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to final surgical approach: HALS vs open (planned). Groups were matched (1:1) based on age, gender, body mass index, surgical procedure, diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and wound classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for group comparison.ResultsOf 7,303 patients, 1,740 patients were matched in each group. Open group had higher proportion of patients with preoperative dyspnea (P = .01), ascites (P = .01), weight loss (P < .001), smoking history (P = .04), and increased work relative value units (P < .001). After adjusting for difference in baseline comorbidities, overall morbidity, superficial, deep, and organ-space surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, ileus, reoperation, readmission, and hospital stay were significantly higher in open group (P < .05).ConclusionsNational Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted-data demonstrated several advantages of HALS compared with open colonic resection including shorter hospital stay and lower complication rate. Further adoption of HALS technique as a bridge to straight laparoscopy or tool in difficult cases can positively impact the short-term outcomes after colectomy when compared with open technique.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The American Journal of Surgery - Volume 212, Issue 5, November 2016, Pages 808-813
نویسندگان
, , , , ,