کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5731709 | 1611930 | 2017 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- The operation time of single purse suture was shorter than the multi-point umbrella suture.
- The clinical outcomes of multi-point umbrella suture were much better than single purse suture.
- Multi-point umbrella suture has obvious advantages in hemorrhoid retraction.
ObjectivesTo compare the clinical outcomes of multipoint umbrella suture and single-purse suture with two-point traction after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids surgery (PPH) for the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsNinety patients were randomly divided into a PPH plus single-purse suture group (Group A) and a PPH plus multipoint umbrella suture (Group B). All operations were performed by an experienced surgeon. Operation time, width of the specimen, hemorrhoids retraction extent, postoperative pain, postoperative bleeding, and length of hospitalization were recorded and compared. Statistical analysis was conducted by t-test and Ï2 test.ResultsThere were no significant differences in sex, age, course of disease, and degree of prolapse of hemorrhoids between the two groups. The operative time in Group A was significantly shorter than that in Group B (PÂ <Â 0.05). However, the incidence rates of submucosal hematoma and incomplete hemorrhoid core retraction were significantly lower in Group B (PÂ <Â 0.05), whereas the width of the specimens in Group B was greater than that in Group A (PÂ <Â 0.05). There were fewer redundant skin tags in Group B at three months follow-up. No significant difference in postoperative pain, postoperative bleeding, and time of hospital stay (PÂ >Â 0.05 for all comparisons) was observed.ConclusionThe multipoint umbrella suture showed better clinical outcomes because of its targeted suture according to the extent of hemorrhoid prolapse.
Journal: International Journal of Surgery - Volume 47, November 2017, Pages 77-82