کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5731843 1611941 2017 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
ReviewA systematic review and network meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
ReviewA systematic review and network meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
چکیده انگلیسی


- Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for most cases of esophageal carcinoma worldwide.
- Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for improved effects of neoadjuvant therapy is inconsistent.
- Traditional meta-analysis cannot integrate all the evidence from different therapeutic methods at the same time.
- A network meta-analysis was used to simultaneously combine both direct and indirect evidence from RCTs for ESCC.

BackgroundThe role of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We performed a network meta-analysis to synthesize direct and indirect evidence to identify the optimal therapeutic method for ESCC.MethodsWe identified 15 randomized controlled trials that compared any of the following 4 therapeutic measures: surgery alone (S), preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery (CTS), preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery (RTS), and preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRTS). The main outcomes were 5-year survival, rate of radical resection, operative mortality and postoperative complications.ResultsNetwork meta-analysis showed that CRTS was associated with improved survival as compared with S (OR = 1.50 [95% CI 1.21 to 1.97]) and decreased occurrence of complications as compared with RTS (OR = 0.50 [95% CI 0.22 to 0.99]). Direct evidence revealed CRTS associated with improved survival (OR = 1.61 [95% CI 1.01 to 2.57]) and radical resection (OR = 4.01 [95% CI 1.66 to 9.69]) as compared with S. In terms of radical resection, CTS was more effective than S (OR = 1.73 [95% CI 1.09 to 2.76]). Findings for CTS and RTS did not differ for 5-year survival, operative mortality and postoperative complications.ConclusionsOverall, CRTS might be the best choice for resectable ESCC because it could increase the radical resection rate and lower the occurrence of complications, thereby prolonging survival time.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Surgery - Volume 38, February 2017, Pages 41-47
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,