کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5731900 1611947 2016 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original researchAccuracy of conventional MRI for preoperative diagnosis of intracranial tumors: A retrospective cohort study of 762 cases
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Original researchAccuracy of conventional MRI for preoperative diagnosis of intracranial tumors: A retrospective cohort study of 762 cases
چکیده انگلیسی


- The most common tumors were meningioma, glioma, pituitary adenoma and schwannoma.
- The overall diagnostic sensitivity and PPV were 72.0-90.7% and 91.9-95.4%.
- Diagnostic accuracy differed among tumor types.
- Some tumor types tended to be confused with each other.
- Preoperative MRI reports should not be relied upon too heavily in decision-making.

BackgroundConventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered a valuable tool for preoperative diagnosis of intracranial tumors. We assessed its accuracy in the diagnosis of intracranial tumors in usual clinical practice.Materials and methodsMRI reports of 762 patients who had undergone conventional brain MRI prior to surgery were retrospectively reviewed. A 4-grade scoring system was devised to establish diagnostic agreement. Each tumor type was compared with the corresponding pathological diagnoses by dichotomization. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for the overall patient population as well as for each tumor type.Results664 cases (87.1%) were tumor-positive, and 98 cases (12.9%) were tumor-negative. The most common tumor types were meningiomas, gliomas, pituitary adenomas and schwannomas. These four types together comprised 74.5% of all cases reviewed. Sensitivity and PPV for the overall population were 72.0-90.7% and 91.9-95.4%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy differed among tumor types. Meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, schwannomas and cholesteatomas were more likely to be diagnosed correctly (sensitivities were 82.6-96.9%, 86.1-96.7%, 88.9-98.2% and 91.3-100.0%, respectively); while some other types like solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) seemed difficult to identify. Gliomas tended to be confused with metastases, meningiomas with SFTs, and pituitary adenomas with craniopharyngiomas.ConclusionThe accuracy of conventional MRI for diagnosing intracranial tumors is generally satisfactory but should not be too heavily relied upon, especially for certain tumor types. In cases of discrepancy, neurosurgeons are encouraged to confer with the reporting neuroradiologists to achieve optimal preoperative diagnoses.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Surgery - Volume 36, Part A, December 2016, Pages 109-117
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,