Remagnetization mechanisms in Triassic red beds from South China

- TD is more effective in isolating an primary magnetization than CD in red beds.
- Both the primary and secondary hematite can be isolated in red beds by TD.
- Secondary hematite is generated by magnetite oxidation.
- Secondary magnetization is influenced by parent magnetite, orogenic stress field, geomagnetic field.

Paleogeographic reconstructions based on paleomagnetic data rely on the reliability of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM) as a primary geomagnetic signal. Remagnetizations, however, can be common in many rock types, including late Paleozoic and Mesozoic red beds, and they complicate paleogeographic interpretations. Extracting the primary NRM from partially remagnetized rocks, and understanding the remagnetization mechanism are important in these contexts. We carried out a systematic paleomagnetic study of red bed samples from the Triassic Huangmaqing Formation, Nanjing (32.0°N, 118.9°E), South China. Two NRM components carried by secondary and primary hematite are isolated in 47 of the 94 samples studied, where the latter component has a direction in stratigraphic coordinates of D=29.2°, I=34.6° (α95=10.9°, 47 samples from 6 sites) that yields a paleopole of λ=60.8°N, ϕ=228.1°E, dp/dm=12.5/7.2, which is consistent with Triassic pole positions for the South China Block. A secondary chemical remanent magnetization (CRM) (D=227.1°, I=80.8°, α95=7.3°) is documented in all 94 samples from 10 sites and is carried by pigmentary hematite that is inferred to have been generated by magnetite oxidation during orogenic activity. This secondary component has steep inclinations and is interpreted to have been influenced by a combination of the remanence carried by original parent magnetite, the orogenic stress field, and the prevailing geomagnetic field direction during deformation. This CRM direction is recorded commonly by red beds from the South China Block, and is significant for regional tectonic studies in the area.