کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
586531 878220 2011 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Experiment-based investigations of magnesium dust explosion characteristics
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی بهداشت و امنیت شیمی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Experiment-based investigations of magnesium dust explosion characteristics
چکیده انگلیسی

An experimental investigation was carried out on magnesium dust explosions. Tests of explosion severity, flammability limit and solid inerting were conducted thanks to the Siwek 20 L vessel and influences of dust concentration, particle size, ignition energy, initial pressure and added inertant were taken into account. That magnesium dust is more of an explosion hazard than coal dust is confirmed and quantified by contrastive investigation. The Chinese procedure GB/T 16425 is overly conservative for LEL determination while EN 14034-3 yields realistic LEL data. It is also suggested that 2000–5000 J is the most appropriate ignition energy to use in the LEL determination of magnesium dusts, using the 20 L vessel. It is essential to point out that the overdriving phenomenon usually occurs for carbonaceous and less volatile metal materials is not notable for magnesium dusts. Trends of faster burning velocity and more efficient and adiabatic flame propagation are associated with fuel-rich dust clouds, smaller particles and hyperbaric conditions. Moreover, Inerting effectiveness of CaCO3 appears to be higher than KCl values on thermodynamics, whereas KCl represents higher effectiveness upon kinetics. Finer inertant shows better inerting effectiveness.


► The Chinese procedure GB/T 16425 is more conservative for LEL tests than EN 14034-3.
► 2–5 kJ is the most appropriate ignition energy for LEL tests of Mg dusts.
► The overdriving phenomenon is not notable for Mg dusts.
► CaCO3 represents higher effectiveness on thermodynamics.
► KCl represents higher effectiveness upon kinetics.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries - Volume 24, Issue 4, July 2011, Pages 302–313
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,