کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
586561 | 878221 | 2012 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Computational Fluid Dynamics CFD can be used as a powerful tool supporting engineers throughout the steps of the design. The combination of CFD with response surface methodology can play an important role in such cases. During the conceptual engineering design phase, a quick response is always a matter of urgency. During this phase even a sketch of the geometrical model is rare. Therefore, the utilisation of typical response surface developed for congested and confined environment rather than CFD can be an important tool to help the decision making process, when the geometrical model is not available, provided that similarities can be considered when taking into account the characteristic of the geometry in which the response surface was developed. The present work investigates how three different types of response surfaces behave when predicting overpressure in accidental scenarios based on CFD input. First order, partial second order and complete second order polynomial expressions are investigated. The predicted results are compared with CFD findings for a classical offshore experiment conducted by British Gas on behalf of Mobil and good agreement is observed for higher order response surfaces. The higher order response surface calculations are also compared with CFD calculations for a typical offshore module and good agreement is also observed.
► Response surface as an alternative method to predict peak explosion.
► Comparison among the different types of response surfaces.
► CFD applied to the development of response surfaces to peak pressure prediction.
► Comparsion between peak overpressure in accidental explosion predicted via response surface and advanced numerical modelling.
Journal: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries - Volume 25, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 81–89