Cumene hydrocracking and thiophene HDS on niobia-supported Ni, Mo and Ni–Mo catalysts

Results are reported on the XPS characterization and catalytic activity in cumene hydrocracking (2.8 MPa, 623 K) and thiophene HDS (2.8 MPa, 523–573 K) of sulfided Ni, Mo and Ni–Mo catalysts supported on alumina and on pure and phosphated niobia. From the XPS results, evidence was obtained for the formation of a surface niobium sulfide with stoichiometry close to NbS2 during catalyst sulfidation. Sintering of supported nickel during sulfidation occurred to a much smaller extent with the niobia-supported catalysts than with the alumina-supported ones. The dispersion of alumina-supported molybdenum was little influenced by sulfidation, whereas, with the niobia supports, the molybdenum surface concentration increased with sulfidation. With the alumina support, the Ni–Mo combination caused the dispersion of the sulfided nickel to be improved, possibly due to formation of a NiMoS phase. This was not observed with the niobia-supported catalysts.Reasonable linear correlations were also found between the intrinsic activity for cumene hydrocracking and the amount of sulfided niobium in the catalysts, but the catalysts supported on phosphated niobia had a higher intrinsic activity than the ones supported on pure niobia. In thiophene HDS, the activity of the niobia-supported nickel catalysts was much larger than the activity of the alumina-supported ones. The activity of the niobia-supported molybdenum catalysts was smaller than that of the alumina-supported catalyst. With the bimetallic catalysts, little or no synergy was observed with the niobia-supported catalysts, in sharp contrast with the alumina case.