کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5872284 1143076 2015 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original articleAssessing appendicular skeletal muscle mass with bioelectrical impedance analysis in free-living Caucasian older adults
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقاله اصلی بررسی توده عضلانی اسکلتی آپاندیکولی با آنالیز امپدانس بیوکلیکی در افراد سالخورده ساکن آزاد زندگی قفقازی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی مراقبت های ویژه و مراقبتهای ویژه پزشکی
چکیده انگلیسی

SummaryBackground & aimsAging is characterized by a loss of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) leading to physical disability and death. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is reliable in estimating ASMM but no prediction equations are available for elderly Caucasian subjects. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an equation derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to predict appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) in healthy Caucasian elderly subjects, taking dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method, and comparing the reliability of the new equation with another BIA-based model developed by Kyle et al. (Kyle UG, Genton L, Hans D, Pichard C, 2003).MethodsWith a cross-sectional design, 296 free-living, healthy Caucasian subjects (117 men, 179 women) over 60 years of age were enrolled. Lean mass of limbs was measured with DXA to ascertain ASMM (ASMMDxA). Whole-body tetrapolar BIA was performed to measure resistance (Rz), resistance normalized for stature (RI), and reactance (Xc). The BIA multiple regression equation for predicting ASMM was developed using a double cross-validation technique. The predicted ASMM values were compared with ASMMKyle, i.e. ASMM estimates derived from the model developed by Kyle et al. (Kyle et al., 2003).ResultsCross-validation resulted in a unique equation using the whole sample: ASMM (kg) = −3.964 + (0.227*RI) + (0.095*weight) + (1.384*sex) + (0.064*Xc) [R2 = 0.92 and SEE = 1.14 kg]. In our sample, ASMMKyle differed significantly from the ASMMDxA (p < 0.0001), with a mean error of −0.97 ± 1.34 kg (5.1 ± 6.9%). Unlike the present BIA prediction equation, the Kyle et al. model showed a correlation between the bias and the mean of ASMMDxA and ASMMKyle (r = −0.406, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe new BIA equation provides a valid estimate of ASMM in older Caucasian adults.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Nutrition - Volume 34, Issue 4, August 2015, Pages 667-673
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,