کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5897746 | 1155276 | 2013 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Circulating midkine in malignant and non-malignant colorectal diseases
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
FOBTMidkineIBDROCAUC - AUCCeA - CEAfecal occult blood test - آزمون غربالگری مدفوعcarcinoembryonic antigen - آنتی ژن carcinoembryonicCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) - آنتی ژن کارسینوآمبرونیک (CEA)Inflammatory bowel disease - بیماریهای التهابی رودهBiomarker - بیومارکرReceiver operating characteristic curve analysis - تجزیه و تحلیل منحنی مشخصه عملکرد گیرندهColorectal cancer - سرطان روده بزرگColorectal cancer (CRC) - سرطان کولورکتال (CRC)Cancer screening - غربالگری سرطانconfidence interval - فاصله اطمینانarea under roc curve - منطقه تحت منحنی rocCRC - کد افزونگی دورهای
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی
علوم غدد
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Midkine is a multifunctional cytokine found to be a promising cancer biomarker, however, its suitability in colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been evaluated yet. We assessed midkine circulating levels immunoenzymatically in 105 CRC patients, 86 individuals with increased risk for CRC (56 with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and 30 with adenomas), and 70 healthy controls and compared its performance as CRC biomarker to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Midkine was higher in CRC (807 ng/L) than in IBD (477 ng/L; 633 ng/L in active and 335 ng/L in inactive), adenomas (418 ng/L) or controls (245 ng/L). Its levels increased along with advancing CRC stage, being significantly higher compared to controls already in stage I, and dedifferentiation (higher in grade 3 than 1 and 2). Lymph node or distant metastases were associated with significant midkine elevation as well. Midkine positively correlated with IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MCP-1, MIP-1α, G-CSF, GM-CSF, VEGF-A, and PDGF-BB with IL-1β and PDGF-BB explaining 40% in its variability. Midkine was better marker of CRC than CEA with 80% accuracy, 83% sensitivity and 68% specificity as compared to 60%, 37%, and 88% of CEA, also in its early stages (74% vs. 52% accuracy). Midkine better differentiated CRC from inactive while CEA from active IBD. Midkine was included in the multimarker panel and significantly contributed to efficient (Π= 0.16) differentiation of healthy controls, adenomas and CRC. Concluding, midkine may lack sufficient specificity to be a sole CRC marker but seems to constitute a valuable addition to multimarker panels devised for CRC screening and/or surveillance.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Cytokine - Volume 64, Issue 1, October 2013, Pages 158-164
Journal: Cytokine - Volume 64, Issue 1, October 2013, Pages 158-164
نویسندگان
Malgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka, Dorota Diakowska, Katarzyna Neubauer, Andrzej Gamian,