کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5931269 1572193 2013 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Arrhythmias and conduction disturbancesVolumetric Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction is Superior to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography for Risk Stratification of Patients for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اختلالات اریتمی و هدایتی فراوانی تخلیه بطن چپ ابعاد چشمی بر اساس اکوکاردیوگرافی دو بعدی برای تسریع خطر بیماران جهت پیشگیری از ابتلا به امراض قلبی-
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی

Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, they do not mandate volumetric LVEF assessment. We sought to determine whether volumetric LVEF measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR-LVEF) is superior to conventional LVEF measurement using 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (Echo-LVEF) for risk stratifying patients referred for primary prevention ICD. Patients who underwent primary prevention ICD implantation at our institution and had undergone preimplantation CMR-LVEF from November 2001 to February 2011 were identified. Volumetric CMR-LVEF was determined from cine short-axis data sets. CMR-LVEF and Echo-LVEF were extracted from the clinical reports. The end point was appropriate ICD discharge (shock and/or antitachycardia pacing). Of 48 patients, appropriate ICD discharge occurred in 9 (19%) within 29 ± 25 months (range 1 to 99, median 20). All patients met the Echo-LVEF criteria for ICD implantation; however 25% (95% confidence interval 13% to 37%) did not meet the CMR-LVEF criteria. None (0%) of these latter patients had received an appropriate ICD discharge. Using CMR-LVEF ≤30% as a threshold for ICD eligibility, 19 patients (40%) with a qualifying Echo-LVEF would not have been referred for ICD, and none (0%) received an ICD discharge.For primary prevention ICD implantation, volumetric CMR-LVEF might be superior to clinical Echo-LVEF for risk stratification and can identify a large minority of subjects in whom ICD implantation can be safely avoided. In conclusion, if confirmed by larger prospective series, volumetric methods such as CMR should be considered a superior “gatekeeper” for the identification of patients likely to benefit from primary prevention ICD implantation.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The American Journal of Cardiology - Volume 111, Issue 8, 15 April 2013, Pages 1175-1179
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , ,