Optimal Titration Is Important to Maximize the Beneficial Effects of Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Heart Failure

- This is the 1st report on dose response of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) in a rat model of chronic heart failure.
- VNS at 50% of the symptom threshold significantly improved cardiac function.
- VNS at just below the symptom threshold injured vagal nerve histologically.
- Optimal titration maximizes the beneficial effects of VNS on chronic heart failure.

BackgroundAlthough vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) benefits patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), the optimal dose of VNS remains unknown. In clinical trials, adverse symptoms limited up-titration. In this study, we evaluated the impact of various voltages of VNS which were titrated below symptom threshold on cardiac function and CHF parameters in rat myocardial infarction (MI) models.Methods and ResultsWe randomly allocated MI rats to vagal (VNS; n = 41) and sham (Sham; n = 16) stimulation groups. We stimulated the right vagal nerve with 20 Hz at 3 different voltages for 4 weeks. We defined Max as the highest voltage that did not evoke any symptom, Half as one-half of Max, and Quarter as one-fourth of Max. All 3 VNS groups significantly reduced biventricular weight compared with Sham (P < .05). In contrast, only Half decreased left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure (Half: 17.5 ± 2.0 mm Hg; Sham: 24.2 ± 1.2 mm Hg; P < .05) and increased LV ejection fraction (Half: 37.9 ± 3.1%; Sham: 28.4 ± 2.3%,-P < .05) and LV maximum +dP/dt (Half: 5918.6 ± 2.0 mm/Hg/s; Sham: 5001.2 ± 563.2 mm Hg/s; P < .05). The number of large vagal nerve fibers was reduced with Max (Max: 163.1 ± 43.0 counts/bundle; Sham: 360.0 ±61.6 counts/bundle; P < .05), indicating significant neural damage by VNS.ConclusionThe optimal titration of VNS would maximize benefits for CHF and minimize adverse effects.