کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5984942 1178679 2015 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Safety and efficiency of outpatient versus emergency department-based coronary CT angiography for evaluation of patients with potential ischemic chest pain
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Safety and efficiency of outpatient versus emergency department-based coronary CT angiography for evaluation of patients with potential ischemic chest pain
چکیده انگلیسی


- Outpatient Coronary CTA is a safe alternative to a 24/7 protocol with comparable clinical outcomes.
- Low risk pain with negative biomarkers and serial ECGs is associated with a very low clinical risk.
- Pre-specified post treatment strategies helps ensure low rates of angiography and revascularization.

BackgroundWhile coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA) may be comparable to standard care in diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in emergency department (ED) chest pain patients, it has traditionally been obtained prior to ED discharge and a strategy of delayed outpatient coronary CTA following an ED visit has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo investigate the safety of discharging stable ED patients and obtaining outpatient CCTA.MethodsAt two urban Canadian EDs, patients up to 65 years with chest pain but no findings indicating presence of ACS were further evaluated depending upon time of presentation: (1) ED-based coronary CTA during normal working hours, (2) or outpatient coronary CTA within 72 hours at other times. All data were collected prospectively. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had an outpatient coronary CTA ordered and had a predefined major adverse cardiac event (MACE) between ED discharge and outpatient CT; secondary outcome was the ED length of stay in both groups.ResultsFrom July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2014, we enrolled 521 consecutive patients: 350 with outpatient CT and 171 with ED-based CT. Demographics and risk factors were similar in both cohorts. No outpatient CT patients had a MACE prior to coronary CTA. (0.0%, 95% CI 0 to 0.9%) The median length of stay for ED-based evaluation was 6.6 hours (interquartile range 5.4 to 8.3 hours) while the outpatient group had a median length of stay of 7.0 hours (IQR 6.0 to 9.8 hours, n.s.).ConclusionsIn ED chest pain patients with a low risk of ACS, performing coronary CTA as an outpatient may be a safe strategy.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography - Volume 9, Issue 6, November–December 2015, Pages 534-537
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,