Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on coagulation and fibrinolysis

- The mechanisms of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) are poorly understood.
- We investigated the effect of RIC on coagulation and fibrinolysis.
- Healthy participants were exposed to sham, RIC, and RIC during aspirin treatment.
- RIC did not substantially affect coagulation or fibrinolysis compared to sham.

IntroductionRemote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) reduces infarct size and may improve prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To explore the potential mechanisms, we investigated the effects of RIC on coagulation and fibrinolysis.MethodsInterventional crossover study including 30 healthy drug-naïve males. Participants were exposed to a sham intervention (visit 1) and to RIC (visit 2 and 3) induced by intermittent arm ischaemia through four cycles of 5-min inflation of a blood pressure cuff followed by 5-min deflation. Prior to visit 3, all participants received aspirin 75 mg daily for seven days. Blood samples were obtained at baseline as well as 5 and 45 min after intervention. Whole blood coagulation was assessed by thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) and thrombin generation. Fibrinolysis was evaluated by clot turbidity-lysis, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1).ResultsNo differences were found in clot initiation, clot propagation or clot strength evaluated by ROTEM® (all p-values ≥ 0.98). During aspirin treatment, clot initiation and clot propagation decreased after RIC evaluated by ROTEM® EXTEM® clotting time (p = 0.04) and ROTEM® EXTEM® maximum velocity (p = 0.03). After sham and RIC, thrombin generation declined as evaluated by reduced endogenous thrombin potential (RIC: p = 0.001) and peak (RIC: p = 0.01). After RIC during aspirin treatment, changes in thrombin generation were inconsistent; increased peak (p = 0.04) and time to peak (p < 0.001) and a decrease in lag-time (p < 0.001).Clot lysis time was prolonged both after sham and after RIC (p < 0.001). After RIC, PAI-1 levels declined (p = 0.03), but t-PA levels also declined after all interventions (p-values ≤ 0.04).Conclusion.RIC did not have substantial effects on coagulation or fibrinolysis compared to sham. Overall, aspirin did not influence the results.