کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6024565 | 1580881 | 2016 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- ERPs were recorded to mouth expressions in implicit and explicit tasks.
- Larger P100, N170, VPP and SPW occur to mouth expressions with teeth.
- Expressions with teeth rated as more arousing than their no teeth counterparts.
- High luminance/contrast in mouth-teeth border may drive ERP effects.
- Task Ã Teeth interactions show differences in implicit versus explicit processing.
If the whites of the sclera can impact neural processing of eye expressions (Hardee, Thompson, & Puce, 2008; Whalen et al., 1998), do seen teeth affect neural responses to mouth expressions? Twenty participants (10 females; ages 22-31) viewed avatar mouth images depicting grimaces, smiles and open mouth expressions that were presented with and without teeth. A continuous 256 channel electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded while subjects completed two tasks: an implicit task evaluating stimulus color and an explicit task evaluating mouth expression valence. Event related potential (ERP) peak amplitudes and latencies and area under the curve (AUC) were measured in individual subject averaged ERPs. Statistical testing revealed a main effect of the presence of Teeth for P100, N170, and vertex positive potential (VPP) amplitudes and for slow positive wave (SPW) AUC. Task by teeth interactions occurred for P250 amplitude, underscoring how explicit task demands can influence neural processing. Arousal ratings co-varied with teeth presence, suggesting that low-level visual features such as teeth may drive the saliency of emotional expressions, and lie at the core of differences in neural processing to different emotional expressions.
Journal: NeuroImage - Volume 127, 15 February 2016, Pages 227-241